home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=92TT2257>
- <title>
- Oct. 12, 1992: The Magistrate of Morals
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1992
- Oct. 12, 1992 Perot:HE'S BACK!
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- IDEAS, Page 77
- The Magistrate of Morals
- </hdr><body>
- <p>There's a lot to criticize in grimy pop culture, but critic
- Michael Medved is the wrong man for the job
- </p>
- <p>By RICHARD CORLISS
- </p>
- <p> Why don't we just agree with Michael Medved and have done
- with it? In his new book, Hollywood vs. America (HarperCollins,
- $20), Medved, a critic on the PBS show Sneak Previews, denounces
- today's movie industry -- and by extension the TV networks and
- music business -- as "an alien force that assaults our most
- cherished values and corrupts our children. The dream factory
- has become the poison factory."
- </p>
- <p> Medved has tapped into a general queasiness about pop
- culture, and not just from religious and social conservatives.
- A large segment of the public senses that the trash has risen
- to eye and ear level, and it smells rank. Freddy Krueger slices
- his way into little girls' minds, and Madonna's siren song
- turns little boys into prematurely dirty men. Once the U.S.
- cinema was ruled by sentiment; now it is tyrannized by cynicism.
- Movies have assumed the omniscient sneer of a '50s greaser; they
- mock or duck any authority, whether the unfeeling parent, the
- stodgy teacher, the irrelevant clergyman or the brutal cop. And
- where once there was subtlety in popular art, now there is
- sensation. Traditional standards have given way to tribal
- impulses, which push Fred Astaire and Ginger Rogers aside to
- make way for a dance of the seven veils. By now the dancer is
- naked; the next stage must be flaying.
- </p>
- <p> So Medved is on to something: the public's numbness at
- Hollywood's shock tactics and the reluctance of critics to
- attend to -- let alone defend -- Ice-T or Studs or the latest
- sadistic horror movie. But he doesn't know what to do with it.
- Instead of just isolating a disturbing tendency in pop culture,
- he is compelled to document it with suspicious statistics, to
- draw conspiratorial conclusions, to call for a return in spirit
- to the movies' puritanical Production Code of the 1930s -- all
- with the fervor of a modern Martin Luther, an angry evangelist
- determined to nail his 95 theses not on a church door but on a
- movie marquee. Problem is, he keeps hitting his thumb.
- </p>
- <p> Medved argues, for example, that the public's revulsion at
- nasty films is reflected in a slump at the box office -- that
- people are mad as hell and they're not going to pay for it
- anymore. It's true that Americans bought only about a billion
- movie tickets in 1991 (the lowest in 15 years), but they also
- rented an all-time high 4.1 billion movie cassettes. And it's
- true that the three major TV networks "have lost a third of
- their nightly audience" in the past 15 years. But viewers didn't
- turn off the set; they switched to independent and cable
- channels. So Americans are watching as much TV as ever, and they
- are seeing more films (in the 'plexes or at home) than they did
- in the mid-'40s, the top years for movie attendance. If people
- hate this garbage, why are they still buying it?
- </p>
- <p> We sympathize with anyone who each year must watch 300 new
- movies, many of them junk. This may explain why Auntie Lee's
- Meat Pies, Lucky Stiff, Homer & Eddie and Closet Land -- films
- that barely achieved theatrical release -- are among the targets
- of Medved's dudgeon. It also leads him to catalog, in avid
- detail, outrages of manners in the movies. Who else would think
- to tabulate recent films with scenes of vomiting (36) or
- urination (18)?
- </p>
- <p> Medved's bloodshot rage makes it hard for him to perform
- the crucial job of a film critic, which is to see movies -- to
- figure out what's going on -- and report it. Here is his
- analysis of Sleeping with the Enemy: an "indictment of
- conventional wedlock as a cruel and unhealthy arrangement."
- Well, it's not; it is a melodrama about wife abuse -- a social
- disorder Hollywood didn't invent. Medved, determined to alienate
- even his core audience of people who think Disney cartoon
- features are innocuous entertainment, proclaims that The Little
- Mermaid "effectively encouraged children to disregard the values
- and opinions of their parents." Well, Disney has been
- traumatizing kids for half a century. When Bambi's mother died,
- kids screamed in horror.
- </p>
- <p> Even in Hollywood's so-called innocent so-called Golden
- Age, movies were objects of public controversy or rejection. In
- Medved's favorite film year, 1939, Mr. Smith Goes to Washington
- was condemned by many U.S. Senators and editorial writers, and
- Gone with the Wind stoked a furor with its use of the word damn.
- Today, other tendencies in Golden Age movies -- the stereotyping
- of blacks, gays and other minorities -- seem vicious in
- retrospect. Back then, the middle class was in charge, and they
- made fun of those below. Now films are a minority pleasure, so
- the majority is the butt of harsh humor.
- </p>
- <p> But there's no proof that people go to movies because they
- approve of the messages, or stay away because they don't. Most
- likely, they are looking to be seduced by entertainment, not by
- politics. They know, if Medved doesn't, that the basic stories
- and attitudes have changed little since the movies were young.
- Comedy always exalts the clever over the dull; romance promotes
- the beautiful over the plain; gangster movies and westerns
- resolve moral dilemmas with fistfights or gunfights. The hero
- is a fellow cocky toward authority. And drama has always been
- a charged debate between good and evil. The more vivid the evil
- -- whether the Nazis in Casablanca or Hannibal Lecter in The
- Silence of the Lambs -- the more satisfying the final triumph
- of good.
- </p>
- <p> Medved may see himself as one of Old Hollywood's lonely
- heroes: a radically righteous Mr. Smith tilting against the
- liberal establishment, both creative and critical. And many
- people will buy his book for the reason he thinks they would go
- to movies: to see their political virtue expressed in public.
- But censorious guidelines for behavior will not eradicate the
- blight, if such it is. People will have to stop going, buying,
- renting. Until that G-rated day comes to pass, Medved might
- lighten up and read some other book. We suggest The Golden
- Turkey Awards, a humorous survey of legendary bad movies. It
- ought to be in Medved's library; he wrote it.
- </p>
-
- </body></article>
- </text>
-
-